PlayerScore: WoW character scoreboards, profiles, and addon

WoW Census Stats Article - 7/19/06 - Page 2/2

Updated Wed, Feb 27, 2008 by Ethec

Class Choice

Since World of Warcraft owes much of it's success to it's friendliness to solo players, it comes as no surprise that WoW players overwhelmingly favor solo-friendly classes over "support" classes, whose abilities are structured to benefit other classes especially in the endgame (like druids, paladins, and priests). While many players believe that Rogue is the clear favorite for much of the player community, owing to its stealth, survivability, and high DPS, the WarcraftRealms stats show that the Hunter class edges out Rogues for the most popular class, except by a meager 1% margin on PvP servers. Warriors beat out Rogues as well on PvE and RP servers. Since Shamans and Paladins are faction-specific classes, and the stats are heavily skewed toward Alliance (see above), we have to go to faction-specific numbers to see that among the Horde, Shamans rate with Rogues in terms of popularity. Paladins, however, are tied with Priests as the third least popular Alliance class.

 

Level Distribution

Level Dist. - All Servers

Table 2 - Level Distribution Data

Level Range
Alliance
Horde
Total
Levels 10-19
    569,193 61%     369,475 39%     938,668 21%
Levels 20-29
    403,541 61%     256,194 38%     666,735 15%
Levels 30-39
    319,386 65%     175,069 35%     494,455 11%
Levels 40-49
    298,415 65%     161,237 35%     459,652 10%
Levels 50-59
    240,304 63%     143,096 37%     383,400 9%
Level 60
    923,175 63%     543,702 37%  1,466,877 33%
Total
 2,754,014 63%  1,648,773 37%  4,409,787
N/A

Table 3 - Level Distribution Statistics

Average Level (Weighted Avg, Lvl 10-60) 39.8
Average Level (Weighted Avg, Omit Lvl 60) 29.8
Standard Deviation, Alliance (Lvl 10-59) 12451.8
Standard Deviation, Horde (Lvl 10-59) 8932.6
Skewness (Levels 10-59) 1.123
Kurtosis (Levels 10-59) 0.583
No World of Warcraft census information lends itself better to statistical analysis than level distribution data. It's not just an academic exercise; if population is spread fairly evenly over all levels, players have a better chance to find players to group with, socialize with, join battlegrounds with or against, or pick a fair PvP fight with. In most new MMORPGs, the distribution looks something like a bell curve cut in half at the peak as players begin at level 1. Statisticians call this a "high normal" or "positively skewed" curve. The bulk of the population moves through the game like an ebbing wave, ultimately piling up at the level cap, and this is a "low normal" or "negatively skewed" curve.

In analyzing the level distribution of active players, we arrive at two important indicators of population distribution: skewness and kurtosis. The mathematics is beyond me, but I understand kurtosis to mean the even-ness of distribution (e.g. are there a similar number of active level 15s players as level 31 players? as level 52 players?) and skewness as an expression of the "weight" of the distribution at either end of the spectrum (e.g. are there more players at level 10-19 than at 50-59?).  

When people talk about World of Warcraft's success, they cite accessibility, availability of quests, directed play, and other qualitative mechanics directly attributable to… well, fun. But one of the best kept secrets of World of Warcraft's success can be expressed quantitatively, Numb3rs-style, through math.  Check out the descriptive statististics to the right. K values from zero to two indicate meso-kurtosis, or (literally) a flat level distribution, and low positive skewness indicates a gentle downward slope in population as levels increase - both signs of as healthy a MMORPG population that can be hoped for. Omitting level 60 - which I'm comfortable doing since, by most accounts, the level 60 game is an entirely different game than the 59 levels preceding it - World of Warcraft meets these conditions more than a year and a half after its inception. This mathematical fact makes WoW a rarity among MMOs, most of which coping with vacant low-to-mid level zones, snaring these games in a developmental tailspin of catering exclusively to players heavily concentrated at high levels.

The Conclusion

So, long story short, your active World of Warcraft character is statistically likely to be a level 40 Night Elf or Human Hunter on a PvP realm. There's nothing wrong with wanting or having a humanoid hunter, so long as you're having fun. But if you really want to go against the grain, try rolling a troll priest on an RP realm. That might just be my next character!


Return to Page One...  

Questions, comments, or suggestions?
Please email me or post in the
World of Warcraft @ Ten Ton Hammer forums!

 

 

Skill + Stats = PlayerScore.  Click here to find out where you rank!
LOTRO Screenshot
Wanting something to do while your server is down for maintenance? Check out these five subscription-free MMOs, sure to keep you from entering WoW withdraw.
Features
Mon, Feb 13, 2012
Mem
Mists of Pandaria -- Pandaren Monk Striking Target Dummy

There have been many rumblings from Blizzard fans that don't really want Mists of Pandaria as the next (or any expansion) and ask the question "Why Mop?"

Features, Opinions
Mon, Feb 13, 2012
Messiah
d3ce.jpg
Mists of Pandaria's launch could happen by the end of the year so what better time to look at what the Collector's Edition could contain?
Features, Opinions
Fri, Feb 10, 2012
Saia
photo.JPG

I finally got myself a Razor Naga (Molten Edition)!

About a year ago, I really wanted a naga mouse for my birthday. However, my girlfriend goes to BestBuy and the jerk working there tells her that I wouldn't like the naga because its too hard to push the buttons on the side. He told her to get me the World of Warcraft mouse (Cataclysm Edition).

Blogs
Wed, Feb 08, 2012
Arxkanite
Become a Premium Member

News from around the 'Net