Might be the most unprofessional article I've seen in a while. Bitch about the D&D 4th ed. rule set for a few paragraphs then say, but the game is fine. Full of false-hoods, this isn't the first D&D the ed. game, Daggerdale was, and other editions of D&D had supplemental rule books, not just 4th edition. Also the choice of author on this at all is questionable, why would an author who clearly hates 4th ed. as if it raped and murdered his family write a piece on the very topic? You should be ashamed of this article and of your journalistic skills. If you wanted to bitch about the 4th edition, go make an article about that. This was suppose to be about the 4th edition ruleset IN NEVERWINTER. I'm not even going to go into the relative strength of your argument against 4th ed, as that would take even longer and this is already feeling like a huge ass wall of text, suffice it to say your an idiot or at least a really weak argument constructor.
GOOD DAY SIR.
© Copyright 2000 - 2013 Master Games International. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.