Submitted by Angel98501 on Sat, 12/29/2012 - 00:12.
I see others find the author of this questionable list of games find issues with it. I just love how the advertisement that got me to click on it billed this list as "Top 10 games for RPGers". The second page is absolutely positively without anything to do with RPGs. CoD? The Sims? Tetris!!???!!! where the frak is the story in that? Grand Theft Auto? Mortal Kombat? Whoever is running the promotional division here should be docked pay for this tragedy. Though I question whether the second page of games even cater to "WoW" players as a niche market.
As others have said Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Xenoblade Chronicles.
After reading some reviews of "From Dust" I suspect that the author here has been paid by one or more of the gaming studios to list their game. Even then I question who would want their game mentioned in this absurd tragedy.
The title should be "Some Blow Hard's Top 10 List of Games (S)He was paid to mention". As it is the title gives the illusion that the list is derived from something other than a sociopath Blizzard fanboy's brain.
Submitted by Angel98501 on Sun, 10/21/2012 - 03:32.
I love SWTOR though last I checked it is still subscription based. Though they are SAYING that they will be switching to a F2P pay-model. I just have failed to see them actually do the switch. I am playing with some Panda's currently but I plan on getting back into TOR. I have yet to find a single developer that can satisfy my appetite for new content. Raiding is ok but I am referring to actual story.
The Secret World supposedly is switching to some F2P pay-model too.
Submitted by Angel98501 on Wed, 06/15/2011 - 20:54.
Money is superior to control. limiting control increases overall revenue. This is why I look forward to when Warcraft eventually gets knocked off its pedestal. Blizzard needs it, so that it can regain some perspective. Also as a side note, limiting control increases growth too.
I see others find the author of this questionable list of games find issues with it. I just love how the advertisement that got me to click on it billed this list as "Top 10 games for RPGers". The second page is absolutely positively without anything to do with RPGs. CoD? The Sims? Tetris!!???!!! where the frak is the story in that? Grand Theft Auto? Mortal Kombat? Whoever is running the promotional division here should be docked pay for this tragedy. Though I question whether the second page of games even cater to "WoW" players as a niche market.
As others have said Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Xenoblade Chronicles.
After reading some reviews of "From Dust" I suspect that the author here has been paid by one or more of the gaming studios to list their game. Even then I question who would want their game mentioned in this absurd tragedy.
The title should be "Some Blow Hard's Top 10 List of Games (S)He was paid to mention". As it is the title gives the illusion that the list is derived from something other than a sociopath Blizzard fanboy's brain.
This sounds more like an editorial page than results from an actual contest.
You forgot to add Engineer.
I love SWTOR though last I checked it is still subscription based. Though they are SAYING that they will be switching to a F2P pay-model. I just have failed to see them actually do the switch. I am playing with some Panda's currently but I plan on getting back into TOR. I have yet to find a single developer that can satisfy my appetite for new content. Raiding is ok but I am referring to actual story.
The Secret World supposedly is switching to some F2P pay-model too.
Money is superior to control. limiting control increases overall revenue. This is why I look forward to when Warcraft eventually gets knocked off its pedestal. Blizzard needs it, so that it can regain some perspective. Also as a side note, limiting control increases growth too.