Posted Mon, Jul 02, 2012 by The Mittani
I have waited almost a month after Inferno’s release before attempting a review of it, giving CCP an opportunity to fix some of the more egregious errors in the latest EVE expansion rather than rushing to condemn it for a Tyrannis-style failure - like many commentators already have. Various excuses have been trotted out for the lack of enthusiasm about Inferno - the scope of the changes, the ancient codebase of EVE, or Diablo III (which is becoming the ‘dog ate my homework’ of the gaming industry). Yet even after hotfixes and patches, Inferno falls flat, both in player engagement (as charted by logins) and when compared to the previous expansion.
Inferno contained three major features, an art revamp, and a handful of minor features. Each of the three major features were either unworkable or contained a fatal flaw at release. The minor features were a mixed bag, some positive, some foolish. The new art - from what is unquestionably CCP’s most successful department - was stellar.
What is infuriating about reviewing Inferno is the inescapable feeling that, if CCP had only listened to feedback from the SiSi test server and delayed the expansion for a month to polish it, things could have been better - perhaps not great, but certainly not the shambolic performance we’ve had to endure. Instead, the company obstinately clung to a hard release date, and the players have suffered for it.
The Major Features
Unified Inventory: A great idea, poorly implemented. The Unified Inventory is the most egregious case of a rushed feature since the Captain’s Quarters; it was obvious from SiSi builds that this reform, which impacts every single player in the game, wasn’t even half-ready. Much like with the Technetium bottleneck years ago, the playerbase loudly warned CCP of the risks of releasing, yet the expansion launched and CCP was forced to issue a number of rapid-fire patches in the face of a storm of player outcry and unsubs - all entirely avoidable. The Unified Inventory broke around some of the most common use-cases of an EVE player - POS inventory, corp hangars, and the needs of producers.
Wardec Changes/Mercenary Marketplace: The fixes to the hisec war mechanics were to be the centerpiece of Inferno, yet like the Unified Inventory it simply wasn’t ready for launch. This new wardec system was intended to create a ‘mercenary marketplace’, but the design plan ignored the reality of how hisec works; certain corps and alliances are happy to work for free for anyone just to have targets - the ‘Privateers’ model. Under the Inferno mechanics, any war immediately attracted 30+ ‘defenders’ for free, with no one able to join on the attacking side with similar benefits. CCP has since backtracked - amid wild conspiracy theories - and added an escalating fee for defending allies; while this may remove the 30+ defender war mode, the first five allies in any war are laughably inexpensive, so the vaunted ‘mercenary marketplace’ - one of this feature’s core goals - will remain unrealized. The new Kill Reports worked out well, cleanly bringing the old killmail system in line with modern killboard reporting functionality, but the War Report system - intended to help keep score in the wars - ignores the key distinction between attacker, defender, and defender’s allies, making it difficult to determine how a war is actually progressing without referring to an external api-based killboard.
Faction Warfare Revamp: For the first time since Empyrean Age, Faction Warfare got some love. The third major feature of Inferno, the FW revamp launched with a series of design flaws that allowed savvy traders in Goonswarm to print isk and Loyalty Points, creating more than five trillion isk out of thin air and simultaneously rigging the course of the Amarr vs Minmatar militia contest for weeks, unbeknownst to either side. When this was revealed, the media coverage overshadowed the actual FW changes themselves. The new FW gameplay, which adds a ‘LP dump’ system and consequences to capturing stations - locking out hostile militia members - seems solid enough; the community that remains in FW after years of neglect is extremely small, but it might now begin to grow. Of the three major features, this was the least broken at release, yet paradoxically it impacted the smallest number of players.
Datacore Nerf: Passive income took a 50% hit in Inferno when datacore prices from Research Agents were doubled. This is terrible news for PvPers who understand how flawed and boring EVE’s PvE is. The beauty of datacore farming was that it provided a relatively small but hands-off source of income, once an initial mission-grind was done. The knock on-effect is that invention of all kinds is now more expensive, further escalating the price of t2 good across the board. I would have more sympathy for this change if CCP had invested in developing EVE’s PvE towards something approaching ‘fun’ first.